Comments on: GTD mac app: iGTD http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/ - brilliant ways to use your Mac and iPhone Sat, 11 Feb 2012 13:41:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-2211 Oyvind Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:44:41 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-2211 I'll check out the new version, Nate. Looks like lots of improvements. I’ll check out the new version, Nate. Looks like lots of improvements.

]]> By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10702 Oyvind Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:44:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10702 I'll check out the new version, Nate. Looks like lots of improvements. I’ll check out the new version, Nate. Looks like lots of improvements.

]]> By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-2210 Oyvind Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:43:11 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-2210 Inbox got a new version a few days ago. The FAQ says the speed has improved a lot. I'll do a test and post about it. Inbox got a new version a few days ago. The FAQ says the speed has improved a lot. I’ll do a test and post about it.

]]> By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10701 Oyvind Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:43:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10701 Inbox got a new version a few days ago. The FAQ says the speed has improved a lot. I'll do a test and post about it. Inbox got a new version a few days ago. The FAQ says the speed has improved a lot. I’ll do a test and post about it.

]]> By: nate http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-2202 nate Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:01:51 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-2202 actually, iGTD can drop things into context/projects via QS now (not sure how new this is, he seems to be a frenetic updater): http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/quicksilver/index.html so far iGTD has been my fav.. i like the keyboard shortcuts and clean interface. tho i'm new to GTD, so... agreed that Inbox was WAAAY too complex. actually, iGTD can drop things into context/projects via QS now (not sure how new this is, he seems to be a frenetic updater):

http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/quicksilver/index.html

so far iGTD has been my fav.. i like the keyboard shortcuts and clean interface. tho i’m new to GTD, so… agreed that Inbox was WAAAY too complex.

]]> By: nate http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10700 nate Mon, 09 Apr 2007 18:01:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10700 actually, iGTD can drop things into context/projects via QS now (not sure how new this is, he seems to be a frenetic updater): http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/quicksilver/index.html so far iGTD has been my fav.. i like the keyboard shortcuts and clean interface. tho i'm new to GTD, so... agreed that Inbox was WAAAY too complex. actually, iGTD can drop things into context/projects via QS now (not sure how new this is, he seems to be a frenetic updater):

http://bargiel.home.pl/iGTD/quicksilver/index.html

so far iGTD has been my fav.. i like the keyboard shortcuts and clean interface. tho i’m new to GTD, so… agreed that Inbox was WAAAY too complex.

]]> By: Ben http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-2077 Ben Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:18:13 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-2077 I've been using Actiontastic for the past two months, and love the simplicity and QS integration. The problem I've been having, and what keeps me from being a trusting user, is that more than a few times it has lost my actions or projects. Very unhelpful. The UI of iGTD seems cluttered, and I didn't like that the QS action only sends it to "Inbox", unlike Actiontastic in which you can detail what project and context you want to place the action. Inbox was too complex to Get anyThing Done. I didn't like GhostAction because there was no inbox or QS integration. Omnifocus, please be the one! I’ve been using Actiontastic for the past two months, and love the simplicity and QS integration. The problem I’ve been having, and what keeps me from being a trusting user, is that more than a few times it has lost my actions or projects. Very unhelpful.

The UI of iGTD seems cluttered, and I didn’t like that the QS action only sends it to “Inbox”, unlike Actiontastic in which you can detail what project and context you want to place the action.

Inbox was too complex to Get anyThing Done.

I didn’t like GhostAction because there was no inbox or QS integration.

Omnifocus, please be the one!

]]> By: Ben http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10699 Ben Sat, 07 Apr 2007 02:18:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10699 I've been using Actiontastic for the past two months, and love the simplicity and QS integration. The problem I've been having, and what keeps me from being a trusting user, is that more than a few times it has lost my actions or projects. Very unhelpful. The UI of iGTD seems cluttered, and I didn't like that the QS action only sends it to "Inbox", unlike Actiontastic in which you can detail what project and context you want to place the action. Inbox was too complex to Get anyThing Done. I didn't like GhostAction because there was no inbox or QS integration. Omnifocus, please be the one! I’ve been using Actiontastic for the past two months, and love the simplicity and QS integration. The problem I’ve been having, and what keeps me from being a trusting user, is that more than a few times it has lost my actions or projects. Very unhelpful.

The UI of iGTD seems cluttered, and I didn’t like that the QS action only sends it to “Inbox”, unlike Actiontastic in which you can detail what project and context you want to place the action.

Inbox was too complex to Get anyThing Done.

I didn’t like GhostAction because there was no inbox or QS integration.

Omnifocus, please be the one!

]]> By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-1868 Oyvind Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:17:24 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-1868 Quicksilver is important for me too. But even more important: An easy way to add files. If I would like to add files to a task, it should be drag and drop, and nothing else. Quicksilver is important for me too. But even more important: An easy way to add files. If I would like to add files to a task, it should be drag and drop, and nothing else.

]]> By: Oyvind http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10698 Oyvind Mon, 02 Apr 2007 21:17:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10698 Quicksilver is important for me too. But even more important: An easy way to add files. If I would like to add files to a task, it should be drag and drop, and nothing else. Quicksilver is important for me too. But even more important: An easy way to add files. If I would like to add files to a task, it should be drag and drop, and nothing else.

]]> By: Dirk http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-1867 Dirk Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:42:33 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-1867 I like the simplicity of Actiontastic, although iGTD looks good. As you say, to early to tell who is best. For me the entry level requirement is QS integration. Without that it is not workable for me. I like the simplicity of Actiontastic, although iGTD looks good. As you say, to early to tell who is best. For me the entry level requirement is QS integration. Without that it is not workable for me.

]]> By: Dirk http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/comment-page-1/#comment-10697 Dirk Mon, 02 Apr 2007 19:42:00 +0000 http://brilliantdays.com/gtd-mac-app-igtd/#comment-10697 I like the simplicity of Actiontastic, although iGTD looks good. As you say, to early to tell who is best. For me the entry level requirement is QS integration. Without that it is not workable for me. I like the simplicity of Actiontastic, although iGTD looks good. As you say, to early to tell who is best. For me the entry level requirement is QS integration. Without that it is not workable for me.

]]>